Performance Comparison of Islamic and Conventional ETFs: Evidence from U.S. Equity Markets
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study examines the performance comparison between Islamic and conventional exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the U.S. equity market using daily data. The sample consists of two Shariah-compliant ETFs (SPUS and HLAL) and two conventional benchmark ETFs (SPY and VTI), covering 1,542 observations. Returns are calculated as logarithmic changes in adjusted closing prices. The analysis evaluates both absolute and risk-adjusted performance through descriptive statistics, Sharpe ratios, mean difference tests, and regression models. The findings indicate that Islamic ETFs exhibit slightly higher Sharpe ratios compared to conventional benchmarks, suggesting competitive risk-adjusted performance. However, Welch mean difference tests reveal no statistically significant differences in average returns between Islamic and conventional ETFs. Regression results further demonstrate strong market integration, with Islamic ETF returns closely tracking conventional market returns. Coefficients near unity and high explanatory power indicate that Shariah-compliant ETFs largely reflect broader market dynamics. Overall, the results suggest that Islamic ETFs neither underperform nor outperform conventional ETFs in a statistically meaningful way. These findings support the view that Shariah-compliant investment vehicles can serve as viable alternatives within developed capital markets without sacrificing performance or increasing risk.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, F., Hassan, T., & Mohamad, S. (2007). Investigation of performance of Malaysian Islamic unit trust funds: Comparison with conventional unit trust funds. Managerial Finance, 33(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350710715492
Abderrezak, F. (2008). The performance of Islamic equity funds: A comparison to conventional, Islamic and ethical benchmarks (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Maastricht.
Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions [AAOIFI]. (2015). Shariah standards for Islamic financial institutions. AAOIFI.
Alam, N. (2013). A comparative performance analysis of conventional and Islamic exchange-traded funds. Journal of Asset Management, 14(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2012.23
Ashraf, D. (2013). Performance evaluation of Islamic mutual funds relative to conventional funds: Empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 6(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538391311329814
Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x
Campbell, J. Y., Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). The econometrics of financial markets. Princeton University Press.
El-Gamal, M. A. (2006). Islamic finance: Law, economics, and practice. Cambridge University Press.
El-Masry, A. A., de Mingo-López, D. V., Matallín-Sáez, J. C., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2016). Context matters: The performance appraisal of Islamic and conventional funds with independence of meeting points. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 40, 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2016.10.003
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
Gastineau, G. L. (2001). Exchange-traded funds: An introduction. Journal of Portfolio Management, 27(3), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2001.319797
Harper, J. T., Madura, J., & Schnusenberg, O. (2006). Performance comparison between exchange-traded funds and closed-end country funds. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 16(2), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2004.12.006
Hayat, R., & Kraeussl, R. (2011). Risk and return characteristics of Islamic equity funds. Emerging Markets Review, 12(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2011.02.002
Hoepner, A. G. F., Rammal, H. G., & Rezec, M. (2011). Islamic mutual funds' financial performance and international investment style: Evidence from 20 countries. The European Journal of Finance, 17(9–10), 829–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2010.538521
Islamic Financial Services Board [IFSB]. (2024). Islamic financial services industry stability report 2024. IFSB. https://www.ifsb.org
Islamic Financial Services Board [IFSB]. (2025). Islamic financial services industry stability report 2025. IFSB. https://www.ifsb.org
Jensen, M. C. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. The Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00815.x
Merdad, H., Hassan, M. K., & Alhenawi, Y. (2010). Islamic versus conventional mutual funds performance in Saudi Arabia: A case study. Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, 23(2), 157–193.
MSCI. (2023). MSCI global Islamic indexes methodology. MSCI Inc. https://www.msci.com
Poterba, J. M., & Shoven, J. B. (2002). Exchange-traded funds: A new investment option for taxable investors. American Economic Review, 92(2), 422–427. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802320191732
PwC. (2025). ETFs 2029: The path to $30 trillion. PricewaterhouseCoopers. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/financial-services/publications/etf-survey.html
Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. The Journal of Business, 39(1), 119–138.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Halber Palaguna Haana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

