HUMAN-IN-THE-LOOP DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN REKRUTMEN

STUDI KUALITATIF PADA PRAKTISI HR PENGGUNA ATS BERBASIS AI DI JAKARTA

Authors

  • Dita Herdian

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62952/jarum.v3i1.111

Keywords:

Human-in-the-Loop, Artificial Intelligence, Rekrutmen Digital, Applicant Tracking System, Keputusan Manajerial

Abstract

This study examines the practice of human-AI collaboration in recruitment decision-making within companies in Jakarta that utilize AI-based Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS). The growing adoption of artificial intelligence in human resource management has transformed recruitment processes into more data-driven, automated, and efficiency-oriented systems. While AI enhances the speed and consistency of candidate screening, concerns regarding algorithmic bias, transparency, and accountability remain significant. Therefore, the concept of human-in-the-loop becomes essential to ensure that managerial judgment remains central in final hiring decisions. This research employs a qualitative case study approach through in-depth interviews with HR practitioners who directly engage with AI-supported recruitment systems. The findings reveal that AI primarily functions as a decision-support tool that assists in initial candidate filtering and ranking. However, HR managers retain authority in evaluating contextual factors, cultural fit, and soft skills that cannot be fully captured by algorithmic assessment. The study highlights the importance of balancing algorithmic efficiency with human professional judgment to mitigate bias and maintain ethical accountability. These findings contribute to the literature on digital human resource management and provide practical insights for organizations integrating AI into recruitment strategies

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B. Mittelstadt, P. Allo, M. Taddeo, S. Wachter, and L. Floridi, “The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate,” Big Data & Society, vol. 3, no. 2, 2016.

C. O’Neil, Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York, NY, USA: Crown, 2016.

S. Strohmeier and F. Piazza, “Artificial intelligence techniques in human resource management - A conceptual exploration,” German Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 29, no. 3–4, pp. 195–218, 2015.

J. S. Black and P. van Esch, “AI-enabled recruiting: What is it and how should a manager use it?” Business Horizons, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 215–226, 2020.

S. Raisch and S. Krakowski, “Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 192–210, 2021.

E. Parry and S. Tyson, “Desired goals and actual outcomes of e-HRM,” Human Resource Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 335–354, 2011.

A. K. Upadhyay and K. Khandelwal, “Applying artificial intelligence: Implications for recruitment,” Strategic HR Review, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 255–258, 2018.

K. C. Kellogg, M. A. Valentine, and A. Christin, “Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control,” Academy of Management Annals, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 366–410, 2020.

M. Raghavan, S. Barocas, J. Kleinberg, and K. Levy, “Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: Evaluating claims and practices,” in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT)*, 2020, pp. 469–481.

M. H. Jarrahi, “Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human–AI symbiosis in organizational decision making,” Business Horizons, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 577–586, 2018.

Y. R. Shrestha, S. M. Ben-Menahem, and G. von Krogh, “Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence,” California Management Review, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 66–83, 2019.

E. Dane and M. G. Pratt, “Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 33–54, 2007.

J. W. Burton, M.-K. Stein, and T. B. Jensen, “A systematic review of algorithm aversion in organizational decision-making,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 220–239, 2020.

E. L. Trist and K. W. Bamforth, “Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting,” Human Relations, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3–38, 1951.

E. L. Trist, “The evolution of socio-technical systems,” Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre, Occasional Paper, 1981.

R. P. Bostrom and J. S. Heinen, “MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 17–32, 1977.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-13

How to Cite

Dita Herdian. (2026). HUMAN-IN-THE-LOOP DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN REKRUTMEN: STUDI KUALITATIF PADA PRAKTISI HR PENGGUNA ATS BERBASIS AI DI JAKARTA. JARUM: Journal of Analysis Research and Management Review, 3(1), 312–319. https://doi.org/10.62952/jarum.v3i1.111

Issue

Section

Articles